<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Apartment Rent Data And Analysis - Rent Jungle &#187; San Diego</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.rentjungle.com/rentdata/tag/san-diego/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.rentjungle.com/rentdata</link>
	<description>Apartment Rent Data And Analysis</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Jul 2010 22:36:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Second Quarter Rents Continue Improvement Trend</title>
		<link>http://www.rentjungle.com/rentdata/152/second-quarter-rents-continue-improvement-trend/</link>
		<comments>http://www.rentjungle.com/rentdata/152/second-quarter-rents-continue-improvement-trend/#respond</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jul 2010 22:00:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>wpadminer</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Apartment Rent Trends - National]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hartford]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hollywood]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Indianapolis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Data]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Haven]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Norfolk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Providence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rent Trends]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[San Diego]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[San Jose]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tampa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tulsa]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rentjungle.com/rentdata/?p=152</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[During the second quarter of 2010, the average rent for an apartment in the United States increased by $27 to $1,087, an increase of 2.5%.

“We are seeing some encouraging signs in the overall national rental market,” says Rentjungle.com CEO Jon Pastor. “In the second quarter, rent nationwide was up by 2.5% when compared to the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>During the second quarter of 2010, the average rent for an apartment in the United States increased by $27 to $1,087, an increase of 2.5%.</p>
<p><br class="spacer_" /></p>
<p>“We are seeing some encouraging signs in the overall national rental market,” says Rentjungle.com CEO Jon Pastor. “In the second quarter, rent nationwide was up by 2.5% when compared to the first quarter of 2010, which is the continuation of an improvement trend that started in January. Rent in Q4, 2009 was down by approximately 3% from the prior quarter, and during Q1 2010, rent was flat. So an increase of 2.5% in Q2, 2010 is significant.”</p>
<p><br class="spacer_" /></p>
<p>Two bedroom apartments saw the largest percentage increase in Q2, up 2% to $1,222 per month. One bedroom apartments were also in demand, up 1% to $970 per month.</p>
<p><br class="spacer_" /></p>
<p>Across all apartment sizes, San Diego, San Jose, Norfolk, Providence, Hartford and New Haven all saw rent increases above 4% in the second quarter. The majority of cities realized increases in the 1 to 3% range. Tampa, Tulsa, Hollywood and Indianapolis however, all saw decreases in excess of 1%.</p>
<p><br class="spacer_" /></p>
<p>“The rental market appears to have bottomed out in the last quarter of 2009,” said Rent Jungle co-founder Rick Ferris. “This is the first quarter that we have seen significant strength in the two bedroom market, indicating that larger apartments may be coming back in demand as the economy turns. It will be interesting to see if decreases in overall consumer confidence that were reported in June reverse this strong trend heading into the remainder of the summer.”</p>
<p><br class="spacer_" /></p>
<p>Rentjungle.com calculates these figures by analyzing over 1 million apartment ads a month. The goal of the site is to help users make more informed decisions.</p>
<p><br class="spacer_" /></p>
<p>Rentjungle.com is the most comprehensive rental listing site on the web. It works much like other search engines in that it scours the Internet to amass apartment listings from a variety of sites.  Rentjungle.com employs innovative spidering technology that can detect both when new rentals come on the market and when rents for a particular property change. All of this data is analyzed and stored in order to keep users abreast of the latest happenings in the rental market. Trends can be tracked by city and by neighborhood, furthering the site’s value to users. Users can see searches on an easy, interactive map that links to satellite street views.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.rentjungle.com/rentdata/152/second-quarter-rents-continue-improvement-trend/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>City Apartment Rent Price Trends &#8211; September, 2009</title>
		<link>http://www.rentjungle.com/rentdata/77/city-apartment-rent-price-trends-september-2009/</link>
		<comments>http://www.rentjungle.com/rentdata/77/city-apartment-rent-price-trends-september-2009/#respond</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 21:50:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rent Jungle</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Apartment Rent Trends - By City]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Boston]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Orleans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Phoenix]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rent Trends]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Salt Lake City]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[San Diego]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tucson]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rentjungle.com/rentdata/?p=77</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[July to September saw a significant increase in rent of greater than 2%  in Louisville (4.1%) and Anchorage (2.6%). Overall, six major cities saw a rent increase of 1% or greater:
 

Rent increase from July to September, 2009
 Percent






 Rank
 City
 July
 August
 September
 3 Month Change 


1
Louisville
729
756
759
4.1%


2
Anchorage
1,202
1,213
1,233
2.6%


3
Detroit
850
862
865
1.7%


4
Orlando
930
950
944
1.5%


5
Nashville
1,009
1,003
1,023
1.4%


6
Chicago
1,597
1,592
1,614
1.0%


7
Kansas City
819
817
825
0.7%


8
Miami
1,510
1,505
1,513
0.3%


9
Omaha
772
776
773
0.2%


10
Salt Lake City
949
936
951
0.2%

















Rent decreases were more prevalent [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>July to September saw a significant increase in rent of greater than 2%  in Louisville (4.1%) and Anchorage (2.6%). Overall, six major cities saw a rent increase of 1% or greater:</p>
<p><span id="more-77"></span><strong> </strong></p>
<p><br class="spacer_" /></p>
<p><strong>Rent increase from July to September, 2009</strong><br />
 Percent</p>
<p><br class="spacer_" /></p>
<p><img src="http://chart.apis.google.com/chart?cht=bhs&amp;chs=550x290&amp;chd=t:0.0407146593245301,0.0255607829106649,0.0169594572377512,0.0149351737160362,0.0141744570832976,0.0102067357472973,0.00680361156242652,0.00250841016983336,0.00194284283768486,0.00166517972977554&amp;chds=0,.05&amp;chxt=y&amp;chxr=0,0,5&amp;chxl=0:%7CSalt+Lake+City%7COmaha%7CMiami%7CKansas+City%7CChicago%7CNashville%7COrlando%7CDetroit%7CAnchorage%7CLouisville%7C&amp;chm=N*p1zs*,000000,0,-1,11" alt="average rent price increase by city" /></p>
<p><br class="spacer_" /></p>
<table border="1" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="3" width="550px" align="left" bgcolor="#ffffff">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><strong> Rank</strong></td>
<td><strong> City</strong></td>
<td><strong> July</strong></td>
<td><strong> August</strong></td>
<td><strong> September</strong></td>
<td><strong> 3 Month Change </strong></td>
</tr>
<tr align="right">
<td>1</td>
<td align="left">Louisville</td>
<td>729</td>
<td>756</td>
<td>759</td>
<td>4.1%</td>
</tr>
<tr align="right">
<td>2</td>
<td align="left">Anchorage</td>
<td>1,202</td>
<td>1,213</td>
<td>1,233</td>
<td>2.6%</td>
</tr>
<tr align="right">
<td>3</td>
<td align="left">Detroit</td>
<td>850</td>
<td>862</td>
<td>865</td>
<td>1.7%</td>
</tr>
<tr align="right">
<td>4</td>
<td align="left">Orlando</td>
<td>930</td>
<td>950</td>
<td>944</td>
<td>1.5%</td>
</tr>
<tr align="right">
<td>5</td>
<td align="left">Nashville</td>
<td>1,009</td>
<td>1,003</td>
<td>1,023</td>
<td>1.4%</td>
</tr>
<tr align="right">
<td>6</td>
<td align="left">Chicago</td>
<td>1,597</td>
<td>1,592</td>
<td>1,614</td>
<td>1.0%</td>
</tr>
<tr align="right">
<td>7</td>
<td align="left">Kansas City</td>
<td>819</td>
<td>817</td>
<td>825</td>
<td>0.7%</td>
</tr>
<tr align="right">
<td>8</td>
<td align="left">Miami</td>
<td>1,510</td>
<td>1,505</td>
<td>1,513</td>
<td>0.3%</td>
</tr>
<tr align="right">
<td>9</td>
<td align="left">Omaha</td>
<td>772</td>
<td>776</td>
<td>773</td>
<td>0.2%</td>
</tr>
<tr align="right">
<td>10</td>
<td align="left">Salt Lake City</td>
<td>949</td>
<td>936</td>
<td>951</td>
<td>0.2%</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><br class="spacer_" /></p>
<p><br class="spacer_" /></p>
<p><br class="spacer_" /></p>
<p><br class="spacer_" /></p>
<p><br class="spacer_" /></p>
<p><br class="spacer_" /></p>
<p><br class="spacer_" /></p>
<p><br class="spacer_" /></p>
<p><br class="spacer_" /></p>
<p><br class="spacer_" /></p>
<p><br class="spacer_" /></p>
<p><br class="spacer_" /></p>
<p><br class="spacer_" /></p>
<p><br class="spacer_" /></p>
<p>Rent decreases were more prevalent across the board with all of the top 10 reporting rent decreases greater than 3%. 4 markets show rent decreases greater than 5%: Boston (10%), Tucson (7.2%), New Orleans (5.4%), Phoenix (5.3%), Albuquerque (4.7%):</p>
<p><br class="spacer_" /></p>
<p><br class="spacer_" /></p>
<p><strong>Rent decreases from July to September, 2009</strong><br />
 Percent</p>
<p><br class="spacer_" /></p>
<p><img src="http://chart.apis.google.com/chart?cht=bhs&amp;chs=550x290&amp;chd=t:0.100418645255079,0.0724204172380678,0.0538324925738402,0.0529831987744779,0.0474817409110093,0.0454929455135116,0.0401222661148312,0.0385152533242504,0.034482176186195,0.0341158370412121&amp;chds=0,.2&amp;chxt=y&amp;chxr=0,0,20&amp;chxl=0:%7CHonolulu%7CHartford%7CCharlotte%7CSan%20Diego%7CMilwaukee%7CAlbuquerque%7CPhoenix%7CNew%20Orleans%7CTucson%7CBoston%7C&amp;chm=N*p1zs*,000000,0,-1,11" alt="average rent price decreases by city" /></p>
<p><br class="spacer_" /></p>
<table border="1" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="3" width="550px" align="left" bgcolor="#ffffff">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><strong> Rank</strong></td>
<td><strong> City</strong></td>
<td><strong> July</strong></td>
<td><strong> August</strong></td>
<td><strong> September</strong></td>
<td><strong> 3 Month Change </strong></td>
</tr>
<tr align="right">
<td>1</td>
<td align="left">Boston</td>
<td>2,015</td>
<td>1,974</td>
<td>1,812</td>
<td>-10.0%</td>
</tr>
<tr align="right">
<td>2</td>
<td align="left">Tucson</td>
<td>777</td>
<td>749</td>
<td>721</td>
<td>-7.2%</td>
</tr>
<tr align="right">
<td>3</td>
<td align="left">New Orleans</td>
<td>1,127</td>
<td>1,077</td>
<td>1,066</td>
<td>-5.4%</td>
</tr>
<tr align="right">
<td>4</td>
<td align="left">Phoenix</td>
<td>897</td>
<td>872</td>
<td>850</td>
<td>-5.3%</td>
</tr>
<tr align="right">
<td>5</td>
<td align="left">Albuquerque</td>
<td>865</td>
<td>859</td>
<td>824</td>
<td>-4.7%</td>
</tr>
<tr align="right">
<td>6</td>
<td align="left">Milwaukee</td>
<td>874</td>
<td>849</td>
<td>834</td>
<td>-4.5%</td>
</tr>
<tr align="right">
<td>7</td>
<td align="left">San Diego</td>
<td>1,538</td>
<td>1,482</td>
<td>1,477</td>
<td>-4.0%</td>
</tr>
<tr align="right">
<td>8</td>
<td align="left">Charlotte</td>
<td>947</td>
<td>919</td>
<td>911</td>
<td>-3.9%</td>
</tr>
<tr align="right">
<td>9</td>
<td align="left">Hartford</td>
<td>997</td>
<td>972</td>
<td>963</td>
<td>-3.4%</td>
</tr>
<tr align="right">
<td>10</td>
<td align="left">Honolulu</td>
<td>1,605</td>
<td>1,549</td>
<td>1,550</td>
<td>-3.4%</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><br class="spacer_" /></p>
<p><br class="spacer_" /></p>
<p><br class="spacer_" /></p>
<p><br class="spacer_" /></p>
<p><br class="spacer_" /></p>
<p><br class="spacer_" /></p>
<p><br class="spacer_" /></p>
<p><br class="spacer_" /></p>
<p><br class="spacer_" /></p>
<p><br class="spacer_" /></p>
<p><br class="spacer_" /></p>
<p><br class="spacer_" /></p>
<p><br class="spacer_" /></p>
<p><br class="spacer_" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.rentjungle.com/rentdata/77/city-apartment-rent-price-trends-september-2009/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
